When to Stop-and-Frisk
نویسندگان
چکیده
This project was intended to demonstrate the bias that machine learning algorithms may learn. We wanted to explore the impact bias has on these algorithms and explore the methods that help correct these biases. Given data about stop-and-frisks instances, we ran several different models on the data and maximized the accuracies achieved by these models. After tuning the hyper parameters of the models, we decided to explore logistic regression, which allows us to manipulate the algorithm a bit more than the other models. One means of achieving algorithmic fairness is the idea of statistical parity, where the percentage of drivers of a certain demographic in our dataset is equal to the percentage of individuals of that demographic in the overall population. Overall, we were able to achieve statistical parity while maintaining a consistent accuracy. Thus we learned that we should be aware of the inherent bias in data regarding people and that algorithms can actually learn to be biased and that we, as members of a larger society, should attempt to correct these biases.
منابع مشابه
Stop-and-Frisk and Trust in Police in Chicago
This working paper examines some of the consequences of stop and frisk as a law enforcement strategy. This is important because stop and frisk has become the crime-prevention strategy of choice in American policing. It is seen as increasing the perception among potential offenders that they face a high risk of being apprehended if they commit a crime or are carrying contraband, and thus reduces...
متن کاملAn Economic Analysis of Black-White Disparities in NYPD’s Stop and Frisk Program∗†‡
We study the possible racial bias of the police involved in NYPD’s “stop and frisk program.” A model is introduced to explore the identification of two distinct sources of bias: bias at the level of the police officer making the stop decisions, and bias at the level of the police chief allocating manpower across precincts. Previous research offered positive identification results regarding offi...
متن کاملLiving under surveillance: Gender, psychological distress, and stop-question-and-frisk policing in New York City.
A growing body of research highlights the collateral consequences of mass incarceration, including stop-and-frisk policing tactics. Living in a neighborhood with aggressive policing may affect one's mental health, especially for men who are the primary targets of police stops. We examine whether there is an association between psychological distress and neighborhood-level aggressive policing (i...
متن کاملThe Law and Economics of Stop-and-Frisk
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 369 I. LEGAL BACKGROUND ..................................................................... 371 II. ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTIONS ........................................................... 372 III. CURRENT APPROACHES TO FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT ANALYSIS........................................................
متن کاملPrecinct or Prejudice? Understanding Racial Disparities in New York City’s Stop-and-frisk Policy
Recent studies have examined racial disparities in stop-and-frisk, a widely employed but controversial policing tactic. The statistical evidence, though, has been limited and contradictory. We investigate by analyzing three million stops in New York City over five years, focusing on cases where officers suspected the stopped individual of criminal possession of a weapon (CPW). For each CPW stop...
متن کاملStreet Stops and Broken Windows: Terry, Race, and Disorder in New York City
This article explores patterns of police ”stop and frisk” activity across New York City neighborhoods. While “Broken Windows” theory may account for higher stop and frisk activity for “quality of life” crimes, the authors suggest neighborhood characteristics like racial composition, poverty levels, and extent of social disorganization are strong predictors of raceand crime-specific stops. The a...
متن کامل